You can find the entire list in
the April 26, 2010 issue of the Houston Chronicle.
TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL RANKINGS 2010: METHODOLOGY
Introduction
Since 2006, the high school ranking
system developed by CHILDREN AT RISK has highlighted the successes and
need for improvement of Houston area high schools. As an advocacy organization,
the purpose of the rankings is not only to provide a tool to parents and
students, but also provide information to campuses and districts on how
they perform relative to their peers and on successful models of high performing
public schools. In 2009, CHILDREN AT RISK began to include all eligible
high schools in the state of Texas as well as extend the ranking system
to include eligible elementary and middle school campuses. Thus far, the
CHILDREN AT RISK rankings have proven to be instrumental in generating
conversations among educators and the public regarding methods for improving
our public education system.
Data/Methodology
While there are a myriad of factors
responsible for the overall success or failure of a campus, the data used
in CHILDREN AT RISK’s ranking system represents a compilation of factors
that indicate the degree to which a campus has prepared students for secondary
and post-secondary success. The data used were obtained from the Texas
Education Agency (TEA) and is reported for the 2008-2009 academic year.
Much like the methodology used by other institutions to rank higher education
programs (e.g. MBA programs and law schools), CHILDREN AT RISK’s method
uses the z-score statistic to standardize the data compared to all campuses
across the state and compute a ranking among campuses included in the analysis.
When the 14 variables used for CHILDREN AT RISK’s high school rankings are examined in conjunction with each other, they provide a more accurate assessment of how well a campus has prepared students for a post-secondary education. Included indicators are specifically geared toward determining the college-readiness of graduates: the percentage of students achieving TAKS Commended Performance standards in Mathematics, English Language Arts, Social Studies and Science; the percentage of ACT/SAT test-takers; mean SAT and ACT test scores; enrollment in advanced courses; completion of the Recommended High School Program; participation and performance on AP/IB exams; graduation rate; and, attendance rate.
Similarly, a middle school campus has data for 10 variables and elementary campuses have data for 12 variables that provide a picture of how primary schools are preparing students for secondary and post-secondary success. Middle schools are evaluated based on the following variables: Commended Performance rates for TAKS Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, Social Studies, and all tests taken; attendance rate; and retention rates. Indicators for elementary campuses are as follows: Commended Performance rates for TAKS Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and all tests taken; attendance rate; retention rates; and, average class size.
One adjustment variable is included
for all campuses. Research has consistently shown that poverty is a predictor
of whether or not a student will graduate and achieve post-secondary academic
success. The percentage of students that are economically disadvantaged
at each campus is thus included in the rankings analysis. CHILDREN AT RISK
assumes a school must put forth more effort to retain and support these
students through primary and secondary education. For this reason, these
schools are given credit for having this at-risk student population.
Thanks for all you do!!!!
Don Wild
Shiner High School Principal